For advanced help please see tutorial on the website (david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) and Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA., Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44-57).
To start DAVID, first click on "Functional Annotation" under "Shortcut to David tools" at the left of the home page. This will take you directly to the "Upload" Tab of the functional annotation page.
To upload a file, you can either paste a list of gene identifiers into the window, or upload a file with gene identifies saved as a txt file. The identifiers can be a variety of things:
Official gene names; affymetrix, etc probeset IDs; ensembl gene names, etc. Open the tab under "step 2: Select Identifier" to see the full list.
*Note that whatever you use it must be the official identifiers from one of those lists, if the names are misspelled or etc. David will not recognize them.
You can also click on the link "Upload Help" to get further instruction on composing the gene list.
"Please note that multiple species have been detected in your gene list. You may select a specific specie(s) with the List Manager on the left side of the page by highlighting the specific specie(s) and pressing the "Select" button&."
(This happens whenever you submit identifiers, like gene names, that could apply to many species).
Click OK to proceed.
Since these are human genes, select "Homo Sapiens" and then the button "Select species". Note that you can select another species instead and the results might be different. We will try that, below.
For this dataset, select from the "Affymetrix 3IVT Background" list, the Human Genome U133A 2 array.
Note that you can also enter your own "background" e.g. in case you have a specialized array, or a species with only some orthologs mapped to established model organisms.
Now that you have the gene list uploaded and the background selected, you can begin the functional analysis. In the center of the page, you will see at top
A new page will appear with a hot-linked table. In this version of David, the GO and other terms are clustered together based on functional relatedness, to give you an overall enrichment for the set of functional groups, rather than the individual terms. This clustering algorithm is a major benefit of using DAVID.
Note that you can also obtain a table of individual GO category enrichments by clicking on "Functional annotation chart" instead. These two formats can lead you to different conclusions, so it can be interesting to view both.
You also need to change the background on the top "Select a Background" list in the Background tab. Highlight Mus Musculus on the list, then Select the "Use" button below that top window.
What are the similarities and differences in the annotation?
Please note that different species may be better annotated than others for certain functions, and it is often useful to examine other species to get a more detailed view. For example, mouse is much better annotated for developmental functions than human. Every time you switch species, you will lose some genes, so this only works well for large gene lists.
From these functional categories, what would be your guess as to the overall function of the genes in this dataset?